Parties Acting Strategically: National Parliaments’ Role in Holding the EU Accountable
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Book chapter › Research › peer-review
Standard
Parties Acting Strategically : National Parliaments’ Role in Holding the EU Accountable. / Kartalis, Yani; Silva, Tiago.
The Impact of EU Politicisation on Voting Behaviour in Europe. ed. / Marina Costa Lobo. 1. ed. Palgrave Macmillan, 2023. p. 55-82 (Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics).Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Book chapter › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - Parties Acting Strategically
T2 - National Parliaments’ Role in Holding the EU Accountable
AU - Kartalis, Yani
AU - Silva, Tiago
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - The existing assessments of EU politicization have predominantly focused on the media and in the actors that are reported in that arena. This chapter offers a novel approach to the study of EU politicization by focusing, instead, on the institutional arena of six EU countries. Using the MAPLE dataset of parliamentary debates, with a total of 724,963 speeches covering a period of 20 years, this chapter offers a comparative and longitudinal analysis of EU politicization at the institutional level, assessing the impact that the Eurozone crisis had in the parliamentary debates of the EU. Automated and manual content analysis methods are used to answer three main questions: Has the EU been politicized at the institutional level? Did the Eurozone crisis affect the politicization of the EU in parliaments? What characteristics of political parties have determined the salience and contestation of the EU topic? Our results suggest that the EU has not been, in the past 20 years, a very salient nor contested topic at the institutional level. However, we find that the parties’ contribution to the democratic legitimacy of the European integration varies significantly, with the parties’ position on the EU topic being the strongest determinant of EU politicization.
AB - The existing assessments of EU politicization have predominantly focused on the media and in the actors that are reported in that arena. This chapter offers a novel approach to the study of EU politicization by focusing, instead, on the institutional arena of six EU countries. Using the MAPLE dataset of parliamentary debates, with a total of 724,963 speeches covering a period of 20 years, this chapter offers a comparative and longitudinal analysis of EU politicization at the institutional level, assessing the impact that the Eurozone crisis had in the parliamentary debates of the EU. Automated and manual content analysis methods are used to answer three main questions: Has the EU been politicized at the institutional level? Did the Eurozone crisis affect the politicization of the EU in parliaments? What characteristics of political parties have determined the salience and contestation of the EU topic? Our results suggest that the EU has not been, in the past 20 years, a very salient nor contested topic at the institutional level. However, we find that the parties’ contribution to the democratic legitimacy of the European integration varies significantly, with the parties’ position on the EU topic being the strongest determinant of EU politicization.
KW - EU politicization
KW - Legitimacy
KW - Parliamentary debates
KW - Text analysis
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-031-29187-6_3
DO - 10.1007/978-3-031-29187-6_3
M3 - Book chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85159083705
SN - 9783031291890
T3 - Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics
SP - 55
EP - 82
BT - The Impact of EU Politicisation on Voting Behaviour in Europe
A2 - Costa Lobo, Marina
PB - Palgrave Macmillan
ER -
ID: 359793705